Subcooling vs. Liquid Line Temperature

There is a common belief in the trade that the higher the subcooling the better the system efficiency because lower liquid line temperature means less flash gas.

This statement is only partially true and can lead to some confusion among techs.

Subcooling is temperature decrease below the condensing temperature of the refrigerant that occurs once the refrigerant is 100% liquid. Our objective is to provide subcooled liquid to the metering device at the lowest temperature possible while maintaining the minimum pressure drop required across the metering device.

We do not want to accomplish high subcooling by driving up the condensing temperature artificially unless there is no other option to provide the minimum pressure drop across the metering device.

The “subcooling is the answer” mistake occurs when a technician overcharges a system to get a higher subcooling number at the expense of higher head pressure rather than lower liquid temperature.

The job of the condenser is to reject heat from the refrigerant to the condensing medium (generally air) and the liquid temperature cannot drop below the temperature of whatever it is rejecting it's heat to. So as refrigerant is added to a system the quantity of liquid contained in the condensing coil increases resulting in a higher subcooling number but ALSO resulting in higher head pressure, condensing temperature and compression ratio.

As more refrigerant is packed into the condenser coil there may be some decrease in liquid line temperature but much of the increased subcooling will come from an increase in condensing (liquid saturation) temperature rather than actually cooler liquid.

Take a look at the system readings above, the outdoor temperature was 80° and the liquid temperature was 82.4° but the head pressure and subcooling were astronomically high due to a severe overcharge.

The liquid line temperature was limited to just above the outdoor temperature and as more and more refrigerant was added to the system the head pressure and therefore the condensing temperature was going sky high resulting in poor system efficiency.

While it is true that a lower liquid line temperature entering the metering device does reduce the amount of “flash gas” converted directly from liquid to vapor as it leaves the metering device this is not an efficiency gain when the subcooling is artificially increased due to overcharge or other method of increasing head pressure.

— Bryan


Related Tech Tips

Ball Bearing vs. Sleeve Bearing Motors
One aspect of motor selection that can get overlooked is motor bearings and it can have big consequences. Sleeve bearings are most common in residential and light commercial applications because they are less expensive and quieter. They don't have rolling “balls” but rather rely on a thin film of oil on metal sleeves. Sleeve bearings […]
Read more
How to Evacuate an Air Conditioning System (Fast and Deep Vacuum)
Evacuation Start to finish with some of the best evacuation practices. Click below to see the video. –Bryan
Read more
Bernoulli's Principle
Have you ever thought about the relationship between velocity and pressure? If you think about a fluid being forced through a small orifice you can fairly easily picture the fluid speeding up as it goes through the orifice but did you also know that the surrounding static pressure DECREASES at the point of high velocity? […]
Read more

One response to “Subcooling vs. Liquid Line Temperature”

  1. I came across this the other day.
    410a system. Txv.
    Low subcooling. High superheat.

    Figured it was low, put about 3 pounds in and subcooling never went up, super heat went down.
    Temp dif was better, but not great. I was thinking I had a restriction or bad txv, but I’m still learning and didn’t really have a clue.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


To continue you need to agree to our terms.

en English