BACK

Study to Test vs. Study to Apply w/ Eric Kaiser

By Bryan Orr Eric Kaiser

Make & share a podcast clip

Keep the exact passage and a link to the full episode. Choose up to three minutes, with enough context to be fair to the speaker.

Start End

Preview uses this episode’s audio. Browser audio export, when supported, takes the length of the selected clip. Nothing plays until you choose Preview.

My buddy Eric Kaiser from the ETS Group comes on to discuss a common problem we see in both students and techs as they study. We talk about issues with how they think about the trade and how to progress in it.

Eric noticed that people who take classes or plan to get certified tend to study just for the end test. The tests may be industry-standard, but the students and technicians don’t learn to apply their knowledge; they merely learn with the goal of passing the test.

Many technicians look for courses to complete. Instead of absorbing information from articles and videos, people want their knowledge to be verified. As a society, we put so much value on completing academic programs. The truth is that learning is continuous; you don’t suddenly need to stop learning once you complete a course, obtain certification, or pass a test. For schooling and study practices to be truly effective, the student or technician needs to have a mindset focused on applicable skills.

In hiring, we should focus on the applicability of an applicant’s skills. Instead of using a written test or relying on a resume, a physical assessment would be a much more useful hiring tool for HVAC/R job interviews. HVAC/R jobs have significantly more difficult physical “tests” than a mere certification exam: work ethic, working under pressure, solving problems, and applying best practices. Studying for an institutional test won’t help technicians or students who want to get into the field.

Eric and Bryan also discuss: