A Common Sense Look at Temperature Conversions

Before we convert temperature scales, let's take a step back and think about what temperature is in the first place.

Temperature is proportional to the average kinetic energy of the random microscopic motions of the constituent microscopic particles, such as electrons, atoms, and molecules.

Translation: Temperature is the average “movement energy” of the molecules in a substance

Higher temperature means there is more average heat ENERGY when compared to the same mass of the same substance at a lower temperature. While there is no limit to how high the temperatures of matter can go (at least that science is aware of), there is a bottom limit, and that is the point at which there is NO HEAT, and therefore no molecular or atomic motion. That point of no energy is called ABSOLUTE ZERO. (To learn more about absolute zero and its role in thermodynamics, please check out our article on the third law of thermodynamics.)

Absolute zero is a theoretical point because it has never been (and likely will never be) achieved. For most of us, absolute zero has no real application, and this is why our most common temperature scales are tied to freezing and boiling instead of absolute zero.

Anyone can make up their own temperature scale. All you need to do is pick a “zero” point based on a known value (say, boiling or freezing water at atmospheric pressure) and then decide on the size of a degree.

In the “Fahrenheit” scale, a guy named Daniel Fahrenheit decided to make a temperature scale. The coldest “constant” he had at his disposal was a water and brine solution, so he called that 0°F. He then used the body temperature of an “average healthy man” and somewhat arbitrarily called that 96°F. This dictated the “size” of the Fahrenheit degree as well as the zero point. From there, he ascertained that on his scale, water froze at 32°F and boiled at 212°F at sea level (14.7 PSIA).

The Celsius scale (often called Centigrade by old-timers) logically used the freezing and boiling of water as the 0° and 100° points. This established a logical starting point at the freezing of water and a LARGER degree size than the Fahrenheit scale.

This means that when you are converting a temperature—say, 75°F to Celsius—you first subtract 32° to normalize for the different starting points of the scale, and THEN you multiply by .555 (I prefer decimals because fractions don't work on most calculators), so 75°F = 23.865°C.

But be careful…

When converting a temperature comparison or differential, you must skip the +/- 32° part of the process. In those cases, you are only converting the SIZE of the degree, not its location on the scale!

That means that if we are discussing 10°F of subcooling, we would simply multiply it by .555 to see that it is 5.55°C of subcooling.


Scientists didn't like the old Fahrenheit and Celsius systems because they are scientifically nonsensical. “There is NO SUCH THING as negative heat!” exclaimed the angry Mr. Kelvin & Rankine (at least, that's how they do in my imagination). So, they invented scales where zero is ABSOLUTE ZERO so that there are no negative numbers. The Kelvin scale starts with 0 at absolute zero and uses the Celsius degree size, and Rankine starts at absolute zero and uses the Fahrenheit degree size.

So, whenever we make a conversion from Fahrenheit to Celsius on the SCALE, we show the converted temperature as °C. However, when making a conversion that is simply as comparison or a differential (DTD, delta T, CTOA, superheat, subcool, etc.), we show it as kelvins (K) to help us differentiate.

Confusing, huh?


Related Tech Tips

Static Pressure and Combustion Test Ports and Plugs
My good friend and contributor to HVAC School, Neil Comparetto, made this video showing how he creates access ports for static pressure and gas combustion analysis. As techs, we find ourselves in the tough position of needing to drill access holes to take measurements, but the drilling and sealing of the holes can sometimes create […]
Read more
Some Belt Tensioning Thoughts
We had a really great conversation on the HVAC School Facebook Group about some belt tension best practices. It turns out that even a lot of really smart and experienced techs are not aware of all the factors related to belt tensioning. Myth #1 is that amperage is used to set belt tension. Now, don't […]
Read more
ACFM, SCFM, & Baseball dents
This is a VERY in-depth look at ACFM vs. SCFM and why it matters to airflow measurement from Steven Mazzoni. Thanks, Steve! Imagine your job is to figure out how fast baseballs were traveling before they hit a sheet-rock wall. The only method you have is to measure the depth of the dent left in […]
Read more

2 responses to “A Common Sense Look at Temperature Conversions”

  1. Hey Bryan,

    your article are really informative and Insightful

    Thank You.

    Owner – HitechDuct

  2. Bryan,

    I’m looking at the technical spec sheet for an Emerson / Copeland scroll compressor. The Superheat and Subcool values are listed as 11.1(K) and 8.3(K). So, in this case these values are actually degrees F and the (K) indicates a differential or comparison?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


To continue you need to agree to our terms.

The HVAC School site, podcast and daily tech tips
Made possible by Generous support from