Infrared vs. Heated Diode Leak Detectors

image_pdfimage_print

Every HVAC/R tech needs an electronic leak detector nowadays and with HFC refrigerants getting more and more commonplace a VERY sensitive electronic leak detector. There are three types we often see but let’s toss out the corona discharge leak detector right off the top. It just picks up too many other types of chemicals to be useful and can easily result in false positives. This leaves the heated diode (or Pentode in the case of Tif) and the Infrared.

Heated Diode

The heated diode is the standard for sensitivity and the ability to pinpoint a leak. Some common heated diode leak detectors are the H10G, the Testo 316-3 shown above and the Tif ZX.

Advantages

  • You can move to the spot of the leak and hover over that point to detect very small leaks. This allows you pinpoint the leak.
  • Tremendous sensitivity on many models
  • Many techs feel they are more accurate because the motion is more intuitive. Place the probe over the leak and the detector goes off.

Disadvantages

  • Heated diode can give false positives from some other substances
  • The sensor is prone to fouling from moisture and oil
  • The sensors need to be replaced fairly often (usually at about 100 hours of operation)
  • The Sensor needs to be allowed to heat up before use

Infrared 

Infrared leak detectors are increasing in popularity over recent years. An infrared leak detector draws the sample across an optical sensor that analyses how much IR radiation the sample has absorbed. Some common types are the Fieldpiece SLR8 and the Bacharach TruPointe.

Advantages 

  • The sensors last longer than heated diode
  • They are less susceptible to false positives from other gasses and maintain full accuracy for a greater range of refrigerants
  • Very good sensitivity, though not generally as sensitive as the most sensitive heated diode models

Disadvantages

  • Infrared detectors compare samples to one another for detection. This means that the probe generally must be moved continuously to work properly. This can make pinpointing the leak more tricky.
  • It can be more difficult to get a sense of the size of the leak because they are constantly recalibrating (in my experience).

As is true in many things, you get what you pay for, so you should expect to pay $250- $550 for a good quality leak detector. If you stick with a quality brand and read up on the technology and sensitivity specs beforehand you will generally be in good shape with either a heated diode or a infrared leak detector.

— Bryan

image_pdfimage_print

3 comments

  1. Terry says:

    Bryan,
    I have an automotive-related question which I am hoping you may have some experience or knowledge to help. I am in a buyer’s analysis-paralysis between buying a Fieldpiece SRL8 (heated diode) or a SRL2K7 (infrared) leak detector. Which is why I found your article interesting on the general pros & cons of each type.

    I am inexperienced and untrained in using these types of tools but have a 73-year-old’s love of tinkering around with cars and diagnosing problems etc with quality equipment. I am prepared to pay the extra $100 for the infrared model if it’s the better tool for detecting R134a in the messy, cluttered world of car engine bays.

    Hoping you may have some advice for me.

  2. Terry says:

    Please ignore previous message. I will look elsewhere for the information.

  3. Wayne says:

    I think the SLR8 is heated diode… the SLR2 is the infra red model

Leave a Reply

Scroll to top
Translate »

Daily Tech Tip

Subscribe to our daily tech tip to receive daily tips and advice!
Email address
Name